|
Poll: US Against Retaliatory Attack
February 13, 2001
By WILL LESTER, The Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) - More than half of Americans would oppose
launching retaliatory attacks against countries proven to have direct links
to terrorist acts, says an Associated Press poll. Men were about evenly
split on the question, women opposed by almost 2-to-1.
"I'm really against launching an attack," said
Della Coe, a 55-year-old Republican from the Dallas area. "A terrorist
act is more the act of a smaller group. The ones who suffer when we
retaliate are generally not the ones who carried out the terrorism, but
children and family members."
The United States retaliated after the terrorist bombings
of two of its embassies in Africa by striking a pharmaceutical plant in
Sudan and an alleged terrorist stronghold in Afghanistan. Four men charged
in the deadly bombings of the U.S. embassies are now on trial in New York.
After the October attack on the USS Cole, many politicians
called for a response. GOP vice presidential nominee Dick Cheney called for
"swift retaliation" if the attackers could be identified.
Presidential candidate George W. Bush said there should be
"consequences."
Republicans were evenly split on the question of
retaliation in the poll conducted for the AP by ICR of Media, Pa.
Democrats opposed retaliatory attacks by almost 2-to-1 and
just over half of independents opposed launching an attack, while a third
favored such an action.
Other findings in the poll:
- Almost three-fourths in the poll said they have at
least some confidence in President Bush on the issue of national security.
- Americans by a 2-1 margin backed bringing U.S. troops
home from Bosnia.
- More supported a proposed missile defense system than
opposed it, by 48 percent to 38 percent. When asked whether they favored
development of a system if it broke an existing treaty, backing for the
plan dropped to three in 10 and opposition increased.
The poll of 1,015 adults was taken Wednesday through
Sunday and has an error margin of 3 percentage points.
After facing questions during the campaign about his
abilities to handle national security, Bush has won at least some confidence
from a solid majority.
"I have a lot of confidence in him," said Kelly
Sovine, a 29-year-old mother of two from Indian Mills, W. Va. "He's
appointed very good people under him. He's doing a good job."
Bush chose Colin Powell, the popular former chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the Persian Gulf War, to be secretary of
state, and former defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld, a 68-year-old veteran
of Republican administrations going back to the Nixon era, to reclaim his
old job of defense secretary. Former Defense Secretary Cheney, who headed
that department during the Gulf War, is vice president.
A third said they have a lot of confidence in Bush on
national security, and men were far more likely than women to feel that way,
by 42 percent to 26 percent. Three-fourths of Republicans and a fourth of
independents said they had a lot of confidence in Bush on that issue.
The public still has questions about some proposals by the
Bush administration, including the suggested $60 billion that the missile
defense system could cost.
"I'm not real sure I'm for the missile defense
system," said Robert Williams, a 54-year-old foreman of a water company
from Hartly, Del. "Things in the world are a bit calmer, the Cold War
is over. ... To spend all the bucks on the missile defense system is not
appropriate."
The administration's plans to build the system have raised
concerns overseas, notably in Russia. A national missile defense is outlawed
by a 1972 U.S.-Soviet treaty, which is based on the theory that being
exposed to deadly retaliation deters an aggressor from launching an attack.
The administration wants the treaty, reached at the height
of the Cold War, changed.
AP-NY-02-13-01 1740EST
|